The Aspectual Issue in the languages of different Systems
Abstract
This article deals with one of the complicated semantic category in linguistics – aspectuality. Well-known aspectologists` opinions on the tense-aspect systems in the slavic and turkic languages are stated in the article. Summarising majority of aspectologists opinions` we come to a conclusion: in spite of supporters` view on binary theory, aspect meanings are reflected by different ways of action in many world languages.
Volltext:
PDF (Russian)Literaturhinweise
Bondarko AV. Principles of functional grammar and questions aspectology. Leningrad, 1983.
Gadzhiahmedov NE. By interpreting quantitative aspectuality kumykskogo verb: The article was published in the TS vol.3. Alabuga, 2005.
Ganiev FA. Specific characteristic verbs Tatar language. Kazan,1963.
Grunina EA. Indicative in the Turkish language (comparative-historical interpretation): Author. dis. ... Dr. Philology. Sciences. Moscow, 1975.
Dmitriev NK. Grammar kumykskogo language. Moscow-Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1940.
Nasilov DM. Problems Turkic aspectology. Actional. Leningrad, Nauka, 1989.
Maslov YuS. Selected works. Aspectology. General Linguistics. Moscow, 2004.
Peshkovsky AM. Russian syntax in a scientific light. Moscow, 1956.
Serebrennikov BA. Category time and type in the Finno-Ugric languages Permtion and the Volga group. Moscow, Nauka, 1960.
Proceedings of the Institute of Linguistic Studies, Volume 8, Part 2, Saint - Petersburg, "Nauka", 2012.
Scherbak AM. Essays on comparative grammar of Turkic languages (verb). Leningrad, Science, 1982.
Yuldashev AA. Analytical form of the verb in the Turkic languages. Moscow, Nauka, 1965.
[Internet] Available from: http://www.philology.nsc.ru/journals/ykns/pdf/YKNS05/1999_05Bolsunovskaja_Kuznetcova.pdf