Discourse Of Power And Discourse Of The Masses: The Philosophical Repositioning In The Postmodern Era
Abstract
Paper examines the discourse of power and mass as specific philosophical phenomena at the beginning of the XXI century. Discussed features of the modern and postmodern power status in cooperation with the masses. Clarified the effect of status positions of power on the content of the discourse. The aim of the article is to identify the classical sense of the phenomenon of power and discursive practices, as well as the establishment of ways to display these practices in a postmodern worldview. Proved that the restrictive potential of power’s discourse in post-modern world is transformed into a factor of its identification as a simple discursive communities. Considered signs of repositioning the discourses of power and as a process of internalization of the masses in the social fabric of the postmodern.
Volltext:
PDF (English)Literaturhinweise
Kolesov MS. Philosophy of power: political power and the state: Bulletin SevGTU. Sevastopol, SevGTU Press, 2004; Vol. 56: Philosophy; 22-31.
Konov AM. Phenomenon of power in philosophical and sociological discourse: Bulletin of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences. Issue № 2. 2010; 43 – 46.
Mamaev IE. Analysis of conceptual models of power and politics in the work of Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu: Belgorod State University. Series: History. Political science. The Economy. Computer Science. Issue number 15 (158). Volume 27, 2013; 186-190.
Marquez AK, del Mar Rivas KM. Legitimizing discourse in situations of conflict: the language and power after September 11: Political Linguistics. 2 (25), 2008; 63 - 73.
Fromm E. Adolf Hitler: a clinical case of necrophilia; Trans. from English. M .: Higher. wk., 1992; 143.
Foucault M. The will to truth: Beyond the knowledge, power and sexuality [Internet] Available from: http: //www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Culture/fuko_vol/
Tsibulevskaya EA. Nature legitimacy of power in the discourse of transitional type of sociality: Tsibulevskaya EA, Ankudinova KA: Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2005, T. 308, № 1; 194-199.
Tsibulevskaya EA. Transitive period in Russia in the discourse of the concept of "risk society" and the problem of power: Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Issue № 5, Volume 307, 2004; 168 - 173.
Van Dijk TA. Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power: Communication Yearbook 12, London: Sage Publications, 1989; 18–59.
Wandela T. The power of discourse: Michel Foucault and critical theory: Cultural Values. Volume 5, Issue 3, 2001; 368–382.