Hermeneutic Aspect of Communications in Interdisciplinary Knowledge Generation Process

Yury V. Andreev, Nadezhda V. Margazova

Abstract


In article demonstrated the possibility of using cognitive hermeneutic methods in interdisciplinary knowledge generation and translation modeling as methods are more close to natural semantic adapting in direct researchers communication. Is shown possibility of hermeneutic approach using to analyze and modeling of communicative process in variegated information environment for as a basis for creation focused on the qualitative data analysis and efficiency for each user information systems.

Volltext:

PDF (Russian)

Literaturhinweise


Ajjawi R, Higgs J. Using Hermeneutic Phenomenology to Investigate How Experienced Practitioners Learn to Communicate Clinical Reasoning. The Qualitative Report Vol. 12 N 4. Dec 2007; 612-638. [Internet] Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR12-4/ajjawi.pdf.

Babich B, Ginev D. The Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology. 2014; 398. [Internet] Available from: http://www.springer.com/philosophy/philosophical+traditions/book/978-3-319-01706-8.

Boell SK, Cecez-Kecmanovic D. A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches: Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2014. Vol. 34, Article 12. [Internet] Available from: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol34/iss1/12.

Bushkovskaja EA. Interdisciplinarity phenomenon in foreign researches: Messenger of Tomsk State University. 2010. N 330 (January); 152-155

Gonzàlez J, Moeslund T B, Wang L. Semantic Understanding of Human Behaviors in Image Sequences: From video-surveillance to video-hermeneutics: Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 116, Issue 3, March 2012; 305-306

Laing CM, Moules NJ. Stories from Cancer Camp: Tales of Glitter and Gratitude: Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, January 31, 2014. [Internet] Available from: http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/download/59/pdf.

Margazova NV. Overview of modern concepts and approaches to communicative process in heterogeneous information environment modeling: Messenger of Chita State University. 2012. № 6 (85); 76-82.

Mikeshina LA. Cognition philosophy: problems of humanitarian knowledges epistemology. 2nd edition, supplemented. Moscow, 2008; 374.

Oates BJ, Edwards H, Wainwright DW. A Model-Driven Method for the Systematic Literature Review of Qualitative Empirical Research: Information Systems. 2012. [Internet] Available from: http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/3183/1/final_pdf_version.pdf.

Pelech S. Teaching Science as a Hermeneutic Event: Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, March 8, 2013. [Internet] Available from: http://jah.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/jah/index.php/jah/article/download/20/pdf.

Perry D. Be Online or Be Irrelevant: Thoughts on Emerging Media and Higher Education: AcademHack. 2010. [Internet] Available from: http://academhack.outsidethetext.com/home/2010/be-online-or-be-irrelevant/.

Ramsay S. The Hermeneutics of Screwing Around; or What You Do with a Million Books: Conference paper presented at Playing With Technology in History. 2010. [Internet] Available from: http://www.playingwithhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hermeneutics.pdf.

Rubinshtejn SL. Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg, 1998.

Shhedrovickij GP. Semantics and value: In: Semantic problems Moscow, 1974; 90-101.

Shlejermaher F. Academic speech in 1829. Moscow: Science publishing office, 1987; 218.

Sljusareva HA. Semantics as a extra-linguistic phenomenon: How to prepare an interesting lesson in a foreign language. Moscow, 1963; 185-199.

Shulga EN. Cognitive hermeneutic. Moscow, 2002. 236 P. Digital book. [Internet] Available from: http://svitk.ru/004_book_book/7b/1704_hulga-germenevtika.php.

Zvegincev VA. Language and linguistic theory. Moscow, 1973; 169.


Refbacks